Sian Meadowcroft
Strange start to a New Year

2012 started with prosecco and Auld Lang Syne and text messages from friends. I don’t count that. Then it started with 3 unrelated events that showed that a new year is still more than a random date change and a chance to drink more than is good for us, no matter how much we try to pretend otherwise. There was a break-up, first. Nobody I was close to, although it would be significant to a close friend of mine. It showed up on my Facebook timeline, clearly out of the blue and appeared to have happened on either New Year’s Eve or New Year’s Day. Somebody was cleaning house for the new year and somebody else was left reeling. That was one.

The second was grimmer and it also appeared on Facebook. Somebody posted a description of a violent fight with their partner, defending their half of it. With a list of injuries to both parties. Again the timing of the post implied it had come as a result of the new year, at any rate both would probably have been celebrating heavily when it happened.

Third and grimmest and this one, please God, no-one that I know personally at all. My train to London, late on the 1st January never left Manchester Piccadilly after a fatality on the line. We were all thrown off and had to leg it on to another platform and travel via Leeds. It could have been an accident, but given that the police were on the scene (judging by the series of train announcements) before it happened, it seems more likely that someone didn’t like the look of the New Year at all and had decided to end it before it began. Poor sod.

My New Year started with prosecco, and I got back to London without much trouble and today I walked by the Thames in the sunlight, which is to say I walked through centuries, because strolling by the Thames is the fastest method of time travel that London affords. I watched the beachcombers (always a few) and I marvelled at the power in the tide and I laughed with a friend and I heard St Paul’s ring a peel of bells and I wandered the Tate Modern with no particular objective in mind, which is easily the best way to do it.

My 2012 has been fairly good so far. In the peripheries of my life though, the year change brought violence, a break-up and then a death. Which is to say that all years have casualties and trouble can come from either drinking or thinking too much. And that we should all keep a weather eye out for the fallen and wounded, if we can.

Why don’t you write a blog, S?

A long-standing friend of mine lectures me on a semi-regular basis about the fact that I don’t blog. It’s at odds with my character as he understands it and it troubles him. I am (according to him) articulate and opinionated (!) and I have been living in the Web 2.0 world pretty much since it came into existence. I used to argue that I was insufficiently narcissistic.  Blogs are people talking about themselves without any fear of interruption and presuming that others are fascinated by what they have to say. Years down the line from the time when we first had this discussion, I’ve mellowed. I’ve come to the conclusion that blogs can simply be about having something you want to communicate and don’t necessarily have to assume you will then possess an adoring audience hanging off your every word. So it’s possible that there will be here, on a very intermittent basis, a blog by me.

I have no idea what I will blog about. I know a number of people who write excellent blogs. Some of them I dip in and out of occasionally. I read only 3 regularly. One belongs to my beloved friend Farran, over at http://selfstyledsiren.blogspot.com/. One to an anonymous (in the online world, I promise that she has a real identity) friend at http://www.my—fascinating—life.blogspot.com/. The third is my friend Amy at http://www.style-spy.blogspot.com/. All of these blogs have a linking theme. Farran blogs about old movies, about which she has an encyclopedic knowledge. The anonymous C___ about her experiences of being a white parent of adopted Ethiopian twins. Amy blogs about fashion. For these reasons (and because they are erudite and witty and wonderful) all 3 of them have a reasonably large readership.

Unlike my friends I can’t imagine one overarching theme to my potential blog. I can’t discuss anything related to my work. They would find me and they would shoot me. Outside of that my mind jumps from fascination to fascination with the suddenness of a grasshopper. As a child I was into history before anything else. I collect perfume. I’m currently drawn to geology (the deep past), genetic engineering and biotech (the future), the Arctic and what will happen when the ice melts that little bit further and the mineral rush starts, slums and what the cities of the future will look like. I want to start making things with my hands (I will be very bad at this, but I have a mental vision of something that I want to make). I am absolutely fascinated by people and how they tick. I’m intrigued by the series of guesses that comprise futurism. I love the wild places and the beauty of being where others are not and only nature is. I love the great cities of the world and the souls and the history that built them. This is by no means a definitive list and it’s only what’s on my mind right now. Today. Tomorrow it could be something else entirely.

I may blog about any of the topics above. It may simply be something that made me laugh today, or my travel plans, or the pink skirt that I’m craving to offset the sleek urban style around me. (It’s swishy.) It could be something else entirely. Let’s be kind and call my interests “eclectic” shall we?

I can’t imagine that there’s any one person in the world who is interested in all of these things and my opinions about them. So I don’t see this blog ever developing a huge readership. In fact, the only people I envisage reading it are people who are already interested in me and what I have to say. In other words, my friends. That’s fine. As I said, I’m not in anyway narcissistic. However I do sometimes have things that I want to communicate to whomever might choose to listen, so there may, very intermittently be a blog. Satisfied, M_____?

All addictions have a gateway drug

All addictions start somewhere. Everybody has a gateway drug. Mine came in a blue star-shaped container – a gift for 23 year old me from a boyfriend who had some vague sense that men should give women perfume. Those without addictive personalities can sample such things and not fall. Others have susceptibility written into their DNA. That blue bottle contained a brash loud gourmand fragrance called Angel. 6 years (maybe) down the line, one of my closest friends was to review it with the words, “You smell like everybody else!!!” and by then she would be absolutely right. The disco gourmand in the blue star bottle was to take over the perfume world. By then though, like a teenager who’s drunk too much cider in her first alcoholic experiment, I was sickened by the smell of it anyway. Overwhelmed by a sensual experience that could envelope me and travel with me everywhere I went (the sensuality of a lapdancer, as it turned out, in that first bottle, but, ladies and gentlemen, I was 23) I gorged myself silly and had to move to other, more refined, drugs to get my hit.

 

I’ve known all my life that things of beauty are created by men with the brains of scientists and the souls of artists (I’ve seen the Clifton Suspension Bridge). Within 2 years of that first bottle, my gods amongst men were mostly chemists, of both the professional and the amateur variety. (Did I not tell you I was an addict?) Moving from bottle to bottle (the next was Vivienne Westwood’s Boudoir – it smells powder pink to your grandma and of underwear to your boyfriend, a neat trick) I fell amongst a community of fellow addicts and began to learn the names that walk with me always now and rock me softly to sleep at night after a bad day: Christopher Sheldrake, Dominique Ropion, Jacques Guerlain (bow your head in passing, people, in memory of the man who accidentally created Shalimar), Andy Tauer, the Roudnitskas (father and son). I could go on. And on and on. Linda Pilkington, the untrained genius, anybody?

 

I know a lot of people who care about perfume, talk about perfume, write about perfume – some at a professional level – I’ll never spray a Jean Claude Ellena scent without hearing the verdict of my friend Tania’s husband, Luca, in their Perfume Guide “angels don’t have sex”. (Although the most scathing perfume review I ever read was written by an amateur, my friend Jane, to describe Serge Luten’s Muscs de Koublai Khan – “smells like unwashed testicles”. She’d never tell us how she knew….”) I talk about it very little, as there are other’s who know far more and speak far better, although my appreciation of the craft underlying each bottle greatly enhances my pleasure. (Once I was afraid that knowing how would ruin it.)

 

My 23 year old crude sensuality evolved into adulthood. It’s a long time since I sprayed on a scent because it could bring a man sleepwalking to me across a crowded room. (Although if you want them, I know their names, the scents that will make chaps double take and start to follow a stranger up the street, the scents that have dropped long married men on their knees to their wives, begging, the animalic musks and ambergris that can make them pull out their wallets, swearing they’ll spend whatever it takes on them, so long as you’ll wear it for them, only for them…) My perfumes suit my mood and my personality now (and my personality switches with my moods). I have protected myself from a stressful work day with the incense and lilies of Passage d’Enfer, knowing that I smelled like a high church to anyone else who came near me. I have wafted both wrists under the noses of everybody around me, ignored the flowers that every straight man spoke for and bought the smoke of the bonfire that only the gay guy liked – it stopped being about what spoke to other people a long long time ago.  I have stood in a NY department store and fought with a sales assistant to buy a fragrance created by a woman later burned as a witch (Santa Maria Novella’s Marescialla) while she tried to direct me to something far more suitably floral than this nutmeg and mace act of sorcerous aggression (“so unladylike!”) I was set upon. My friend Farran, a floral Alabama girl at heart stood by me and valiantly fought my corner, “I don’t care what it smells like on other people, it is WONDERFUL on her.” This week, fearing the loss of something I valued, I kept myself safe in the vanilla hug of Musc Ravageur and stayed safe and comforted.

 

I smell like a church, like honeyed water, like oranges and curry – to some people, sometimes.  I have never yet worn the truly repulsive smell of crypts, but I know who sells it and where you can buy it, if you’re tempted. I don’t care if you like what I’m wearing or not, to be honest. You can have an opinion on my shoes. Tell me I need a haircut, my mother always does. Tell me I’m showing too much leg or not enough cleavage, that I don’t make enough of this or that, that my working look is unprofessional. That’s fine. My perfume belongs to me. Only one rule remains, whatever I smell of during a working day, or on a weekend, on a beach, or out to dinner, there are certain nights when I always smell like a woman. Not a lapdancer, these days, I hope, but unmistakably female, adult and alive with possibility. The scents that you just want to get that little bit closer to, and that little bit closer and that little bit closer, even when you don’t know why. Only two, on days like that: Ormonde Woman’s black hemlock forest or Une Fleur de Cassie’s elegant, come-hither stand-offishness. Don’t wait up.